UNDER CONTROL, OR OUT OF CONTROL: the formation of society and the deinition of bounderies

You've probably heard these phrases before; from parents to policemen, and maybe even from yourself. 'everything is under control' or 'this is out of control'. The policemen stands in front of the video camera to assure the public that everything is under control, that nothing is out of control and they can rest assured that (the unnamed thing) is secure. So what is it they are trying to secure? What is it that is either under control (good), or out of control (bad)? They are trying to secure, or fix in place, the behavior of people, other animals, or plants to fit within the boundries of society, which is to say within the relm of control/inside the gates. the phrase "to be under control", is very clear on what the dynamics of that relationship are. To be beneith the Control, the limiter. This seems to imply that Control is not merely a way of acting but a dominating force unto itself, almost independent of the will of the individual. The acting out of the will of Control, is the setting up of fences to define the boarders of what actions, and sometimes even ideas, can and cannot happen. It is this force, Control, that creates and maintains society. Although, possibility could also be said to be such a force, but that is not pertinent to this tract and whould require its own. How this force is expressed can take many forms; from auto-repressively with or without violent enforcement where the voice of control is in the heads of the controlled, to physical others who, violently or non-violently, coerce or present as beneficial the will of Control, the acceptance of boundries. When "to be out of/in control" is said, another atribute or the nature of Control is shown. that control is not only something that we are beneith, but it is also a place that we are either inside of, or outside of, a place with boundries. a world unto itself. This can only be maintained by what is "outside" not percievably existing so that the relm of Control is seen as everything, the extent of the existant. Difference cannot be astablished to exist if there is not a with and a with-out to which to draw a conclusion of difference. Thus the act of declaring and/or pointing to the existance of an "outside the gates of Control" is in and of itself a direct attack on Control. Control is then presented with three options; assimilate (bring under control), exterminate, or loose. The most beneficial and easiest for Control is to assimilate, the least beneficial is to loose. Therefore, it is most beneficial for Controls general state to be one of expansion, growth. for it to loose, is for it to contract. This pattern of behavior, is entirely similar to that of Civilization.

NOTE: To fight civilization one must understand its nature, where it is/what it is.